OpenAI, a leading entity in the field of artificial intelligence, has recently released a new roadmap for AGI (Artificial General Intelligence), dividing AI capabilities into five levels. This five-level roadmap has sparked widespread attention and heated discussions within the industry upon its release. However, it has also faced criticism and skepticism from some professionals and netizens.
According to OpenAI's plan, AI is currently at Level 1, equivalent to chatbot capabilities. The subsequent four levels are: Level 2 Reasoner (human-level problem-solving), Level 3 Agent (systems capable of taking action), Level 4 Innovator (AI that can assist in invention), and Level 5 Organizer (AI capable of organizational tasks). OpenAI aims to provide a clear framework for AI development through this structured scale, ensuring that every step towards AGI is measurable and responsible.
Image Source: Image generated by AI, authorized by Midjourney
However, this seemingly perfect "five-step strategy" has been questioned by many, including Elon Musk. They argue that OpenAI's roadmap is vague in naming and definition, and the hierarchical structure of the five levels appears "logically chaotic." Some even believe that this might just be a pie chart drawn by OpenAI for investors, a hollow marketing tactic.
Some criticisms focus on OpenAI's definition of "superintelligence." The concept of Artificial Super Intelligence (ASI) itself is controversial, lacking a clear and widely accepted definition. Simplistically defining a level as ASI could lead to misunderstandings, causing unrealistic expectations or concerns about AI's capabilities and potential impacts.
In addition to the confusion over concepts and definitions, the rationality of this five-level sequence has also been questioned. Some point out that the sequence is unreasonable according to the development level of human capabilities. For example, Level 3 tasks are already being performed by some autonomous agents, while Level 2 tasks might not be achievable by some doctoral-level individuals. This raises the question: does this five-level sequence really hold up?
Whether OpenAI's five-level AGI roadmap is a significant breakthrough in the field of artificial intelligence or merely a hollow marketing ploy remains to be seen through time and practice. However, it is undeniable that it has sparked thoughts and discussions about the future development of artificial intelligence, which is itself a meaningful endeavor.
In this era of rapid AI development, we need more rational voices to guide and promote the healthy and orderly development of this field. As for OpenAI's roadmap, we should stay attentive and wait and see.