The United States District Court for the Northern District of California made an important ruling allowing the use of copyrighted works to train artificial intelligence models. This decision has drawn widespread attention and controversy, especially in the creative industry, where many artists and content creators have expressed concerns. The ruling supported the defendant company Anthropic in using pirated materials to train its AI model Claude without authorization, further sparking discussions about creators' rights.
According to technology media AppleInsider, many creators and artists have long been troubled by artificial intelligence companies scraping their works without permission. These companies use the scraped data to train large language models (LLMs) and commercialize them, yet the original content creators receive little or no compensation. In 2024, Andrea Bartz, Charles Graeber, and Kirk Wallace Johnson filed a lawsuit against Anthropic, accusing the company of copyright infringement by using pirated materials.
Judge William Alsup supported some of the requests from both sides but ultimately concluded that copies used to train specific large language models fall under fair use. This ruling means that AI companies can legally use copyrighted content when training their models, which has disappointed many artists, musicians, and writers. For these creators, this decision may expose them to greater commercial risks, as the capabilities of AI models could further erode the value of their work.
This ruling has far-reaching implications for the creative industry, potentially leading to more damage to the economic interests of artists and content creators. The development of AI technology is changing the landscape of creation and content production, and many creators may face a more difficult survival environment. Their hard work and life experiences are being exploited by AI models, yet they have almost no means of recourse.
In the future, as AI technology continues to develop, the conflict between creators and AI companies may become more pronounced. How to protect the legitimate rights and interests of creators will be an urgent issue to address.
Key points:
🌐 Recently, a California court ruled that it is permissible to use copyrighted content to train AI, supporting Anthropic's actions.
📚 This ruling has raised concerns among creators about their rights being violated, believing that their works will be used by AI companies without any gain.
⚖️ The judge considered this action as fair use, and this decision may change the future of the creative industry.