Search AI Products and News

Recently, the Central Cyberspace Administration launched the Clean Web Action - Special Campaign to Address the Abuse of AI Technology. Since April 2025, a series of rectification efforts have been carried out targeting the abuse of AI technology. The campaign focuses on addressing issues such as infringements on public rights caused by AI face swapping and voice imitation technologies, as well as misleading the public due to lack of content labeling. After the first phase, joint efforts from cyberspace administration departments at all levels have achieved remarkable results. Image source note: The image is generated by AI, and the image authorization service provider is Midjourney; during the rectification process, a cumulative total of

In the federal court in Washington, D.C., a major antitrust case against Google (Alphabet Inc.) is underway, with Judge Amit Mehta facing a difficult decision. As the trial progresses, the judge needs to decide whether to break up this tech giant to limit its monopolistic behavior in the search engine market. At the same time, he must also consider Google's significant advantages in the field of artificial intelligence. Last Friday, Google's legal team and representatives from the U.S. Department of Justice made their final arguments in court.

According to TechPolicy, the U.S. House of Representatives narrowly passed a bill called HR1 with 215 votes in favor and 214 votes against. The bill will ban any state in the United States from regulating artificial intelligence (AI) within the next ten years. This decision means that no laws or regulations regarding AI models, AI systems, or automated decision-making systems can be implemented by any state or its related political institutions within the next decade. The passage of this bill is favorable for many tech giants such as Microsoft, OpenAI, Google, and Amazon.

OpenAI, in a recent submission to the US government on AI regulation, advocated for federal leadership in overseeing AI regulation, rather than allowing individual states to implement stricter rules. The company believes that unified federal regulation would foster innovation in the US AI sector and reduce inconsistencies across different state regulations. Image credit: Image generated by AI, image licensing service Midjourney. In this 15-page document, OpenAI notes that China's AI regulatory measures could potentially disadvantage the US.

On his first day in office, President Trump announced the revocation of an executive order signed by former President Biden in 2023, which aimed to mitigate the risks posed by artificial intelligence (AI) to consumers, workers, and national security. Biden's executive order directed the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), under the U.S. Department of Commerce, to establish guidelines to help businesses identify and rectify flaws in their AI models, including biases. Furthermore, the executive order required developers of AI systems to report to the U.S. government before publicly launching their products.

In terms of artificial intelligence (AI) regulation, the UK government has expressed a desire to take an independent stance and plans to adopt different approaches from its main Western counterparts, such as the EU and the US. UK AI and Digital Government Minister Feryal Clark emphasized in an interview with CNBC that the UK must 'do its own thing' to ensure necessary regulations are in place early on regarding the safety of AI models. Image source note: The image was generated by AI and provided by the image service provider Midjourney.

Recently, OpenAI released a document titled 'Economic Blueprint,' aimed at discussing policies with the U.S. government and its allies to solidify America's technological leadership in the field of artificial intelligence. The blueprint mentions that the U.S. must attract billions of dollars in funding to secure chips, data, energy, and talent in order to win the AI competition. Chris Lehane, Vice President of Global Affairs at OpenAI, stated in the preface that while some countries are taking steps towards AI and its economic potential,

Thailand's Ministry of Industry recently announced the introduction of an artificial intelligence (AI) system to enhance the regulation of counterfeit products sold on online platforms. Pongpol Yodmuangcharoen, the secretary of the ministry's industrial reform and innovation committee, stated on Wednesday that the proposal was discussed during the committee's meeting on December 20. The committee learned during its second meeting on December 20 that a study indicated the ministry's AI system could monitor and detect 100,000 items daily.

Against the backdrop of Trump's return to the White House, top entrepreneurs from Silicon Valley are quietly becoming key technological advisors to the president. Elon Musk, Marc Andreessen, and David Sacks are among those strategizing for Trump, with their most notable point being their strong criticism of AI regulation. This group of tech elites believes that AI chatbots are emerging as a new ideological battleground. Their core concern is that large tech companies may use AI systems to propagate specific political positions, achieving a more covert and effective form of 'regulation'.

The Italian Data Protection Authority (GPDP) recently issued a warning to local media group GEDI, indicating that its collaboration agreement with OpenAI, the parent company of ChatGPT, may violate EU privacy protection laws. According to this agreement, GEDI plans to provide its Italian language news content to ChatGPT subscribers, while OpenAI may use GEDI's news archives to enhance the accuracy of its products. The GPDP stressed that GEDI's digital archive contains a significant amount of personal information, including numerous details and even sensitive data.

In today's rapidly advancing era of artificial intelligence technology, AI regulation in the United States finds itself in an extremely chaotic time. With the Trump administration about to take office, its hands-off approach to tech regulation is driving a dramatic regulatory struggle. Currently, the landscape of AI regulation in the U.S. resembles a fragmented puzzle: there is a lack of unified policy at the federal level, states are acting independently, and some areas lack clear rules altogether. This regulatory vacuum is creating an arena filled with uncertainty and risks for tech giants. The Trump team is considering appointing an 'AI Tsar'...

Recently, a group of tech giants and venture capitalists jointly issued a statement opposing California Senator Scott Wiener’s SB1047 bill. This bill aims to strengthen the regulation of artificial intelligence, prompting strong opposition from the tech industry. Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz, co-founders of Andreessen Horowitz, along with Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella.

Recently, California Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed the highly anticipated SB1047 bill, which aimed to regulate the development of large AI models. This decision has sparked extensive debate in the tech and political arenas. SB1047, proposed by State Senator Scott Wiener, required companies developing AI models with a cost of at least $100 million and utilizing 10^26 FLOPS of computational power to implement safety protocols. The bill was passed by the California legislature but faced backlash from figures including OpenAI and Meta's Chief AI Scientist Yann LeCun.